SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: response reason



    Julian,
    
    I was about to send a message to you on this myself.
    
    I think it's better to leave the wording in 12-96 as is, and
    change the "Reason" to "Response reason" in the table in
    section 9.4.6.2.
    
    The problem with the changed wording in 12-97 is that
    it still does not mention the sense key, and states something
    that isn't accurate (for ex., there is no 'Sense of "protocol
    service CRC error" ', the SPC-3 name for it is "CRC error
    detected").  The more descriptive "reason" terminology is
    an iSCSI notion we had adopted quite a while ago.
    
    I reason I had used "Response reason" as in index into the
    said table is to avoid repeating the CHECKCONDITION/Key/
    ASC/ASCQ information everywhere - but I had overlooked that the
    table doesn't use "response reason".  I'd recommend fixing just
    that.
    
    Thanks.
    --
    Mallikarjun
    
    Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
    Networked Storage Architecture
    Network Storage Solutions
    Hewlett-Packard MS 5668
    Roseville CA 95747
    cbm@rose.hp.com
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
    To: <Eddy@Quicksall.com>
    Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
    Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:07 AM
    Subject: Re: iSCSI: response reason
    
    
    > thanks - it is fixed in 12-97 - Julo
    >
    >
    >
    >                       "Eddy Quicksall"
    >                       <Eddy@Quicksall.c        To:       Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
    >                       om>                      cc:       <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    >                                                Subject:  iSCSI: response reason
    >                       06/06/2002 11:28
    >                       PM
    >                       Please respond to
    >                       Eddy
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Section 6.5 Digest Errors uses the phrase "iSCSI response reason" and
    > refers to section 9.4.3. But there is no such term used in that section.
    >
    > There is, however, a term used called "iSCSI service response". But,
    > section 6.5 is not talking about that.
    >
    > I believe section 6.5 is talking about the heading "reason" that appears in
    > the 1st column of the table in section 9.4.6.2.
    >
    > So to clarify things, how about changing the table heading in 9.4.6.2 to
    > say "iSCSI Condition" and section 6.5 to say "iSCSI Condition (Section
    > 9.4.6.2  Sense Data)?
    >
    > The term "iSCSI Condition" is also compatible with the same term used in
    > the 2nd paragraph of 9.4.6.2.
    >
    > Eddy
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
    


Home

Last updated: Sat Jun 08 01:18:43 2002
10602 messages in chronological order