SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: keys/parameter dependence



    The text should read now:
    
           If DataSequenceInOrder is set to Yes, a target may retry at most the
           last R2T, and an initiator may at most request retransmission for
           the last read data sequence.  For this reason if ErrorRecoveryLevel
           is not 0 and DataSequenceInOrder is set to Yes then MaxOustandingR2T
           MUST be set to 1.
    
     Julo
    
    
                                                                                                                                                   
                          "Robert D.                                                                                                               
                          Russell"                 To:       ips@ece.cmu.edu                                                                       
                          <rdr@io.iol.unh.e        cc:                                                                                             
                          du>                      Subject:  RE: iSCSI: keys/parameter dependence                                                  
                          Sent by:                                                                                                                 
                          owner-ips@ece.cmu                                                                                                        
                          .edu                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                   
                          06/06/2002 06:07                                                                                                         
                          PM                                                                                                                       
                          Please respond to                                                                                                        
                          "Robert D.                                                                                                               
                          Russell"                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                   
    
    
    
    Julian:
    
    I came across another dependency in draft 12-96 (but it has been
    in the drafts for some time):
    
    The end of section 11.20 says:
    
       "If ErrorRecoveryLevel is not 0 and if DataSequenceInOrder is set to
       Yes, a target may retry at most the last R2T, and an initiator may at
       most request retransmission for the last read data sequence.
       MaxOutstandingR2T MUST be set to 1 in this case."
    
    It is unclear to me from reading this just what the "in this case"
    refers to -- does it mean:
    
    1) if MaxOutstandingR2T is not 1 then the target may not retry and
       the initiator may not request retransmission.
    
    or
    
    2) the combination ErrorRecoveryLevel > 0 and DataSequenceInOrder=Yes
       requires MaxOutStandingR2T=1.
    
    If the first interpretation is correct, then this is not really a
    dependency between the keys, but a subtle restriction on behavior
    from a certain combination of keys.
    
    If the second interpretation is correct, then this is a dependency
    between keys.
    
    Whichever interpretation is correct, I would suggest that the statement
    in section 11.20 be reworded to make the interpretation unambiguous.
    
    Thanks,
    Bob Russell
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Mon Jan 27 19:19:07 2003
12261 messages in chronological order