RE: Flipped locations between d11 and d12.

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

IETF rules - Julo

"Sankar, Ranga" <ranga@netapp.com> 05/22/2002 07:28 PM Please respond to "Sankar, Ranga"

To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL         cc:        "'ips@ece.cmu.edu'" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>, "Pittman, Joseph" <jpittman@netapp.com>         Subject:        RE: Flipped locations between d11 and d12.

The new notation is counter intuitive and causes confusion. 
If there is no specific reasoni would prefer it to be the way it 
was in earlier drafts (D11).

-ranga


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 1:35 AM
> To: Sankar, Ranga
> Cc: 'ips@ece.cmu.edu'; Julian Satran
> Subject: Re: Flipped locations between d11 and d12.
> 
> 
> 
> It is no mistake. It is only that this new notation is the 
> one preferred by
> the RFC editor.
> 
> Julo
> 
> 
>                                                               
>                                                                    
>                       "Sankar, Ranga"                         
>                                                                    
>                       <Ranga.Sankar@net        To:       
> "'ips@ece.cmu.edu'" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>                         
>           
>                       app.com>                 cc:       
> Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL                                 
>           
>                                                Subject:  
> Flipped locations between d11 and d12.                        
>           
>                       05/21/2002 10:54                        
>                                                                    
>                       PM                                      
>                                                                    
>                       Please respond to                       
>                                                                    
>                       "Sankar, Ranga"                         
>                                                                    
>                                                               
>                                                                    
>                                                               
>                                                                    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Looks like the bit locations are flipped between Version 11 and 12.
> 
> For example  Bit 0 of Byte 1 corresponds to T bit in Version 12
> In Version 11 and below Bit 7 of Byte 1 corresponds to T bit.
> 
> Is this intended or an error in the draft.
> 
> Version 12
> 
> Login Response
> Byte / 0           | 1                     | 2                     | 3
>              |
> |0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7|
> <---------
>  . .       0x23
> 
> Version 11
> Byte / 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | / | | | |
> |7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0|
> <----------
> +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
> 0|.|.| 0x23              |T|0 0 0|CSG|NSG| Version-max | 
> Version-active|
> 
> -ranga
> 
> 
> 
>