Re: iSCSI - re-phrase of 4.1

[Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>]

> "THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1)" wrote:
> 
> hex-constant: unsigned hexadecimal constant described by regu-lar expression "0[xX][0-9a-zA-Z]+"
> Hexidecimal only uses the alphabet up to F so the regular expression should be:
> "0[xX][0-9a-fA-F]+"

Wasn't there some consenus that there will be no extra leading 0, unless
part of the base identifier (and thus at most one)? Else I can
put 1e9 zeros like this: 0x0000...03 to be a valid hex const.

Also why do we need to _restrict_ as to the sign of
a hex constant. I'm sure that sooner or later it will
have its applications. If a value cannot be negative
and a node sent it as negative then the peer will
reply with Reject or appropriately.

Isn't all this the whole point of interoperability and
the use of Reject, et al?

Thus,
hex const: 0[xX][1-9A-Fa-f]+[0-9A-Fa-f]*

And similarly for the others.

-- 
Luben