SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iFCP as an IP Storage Work Item



    > While it is easy to say that as a vendor it should be possible for them to
    > support iSCSI, iFCP and FCIP protocols, the cost of developing a solution
    > that addresses all three (which includes not just product development but
    > testing, certifying and validating interoperable solutions) is something
    > that we as a vendor would not like to be drawn into. If you think
    > this is a business reason, and should be ignored, we
    > disagree with that opinion.
    
    I have been trying to avoid taking side on this iFCP vs. FCIP debate on the
    technical merits.  May be I can take my technical hat off and debate on the
    business merits.
    
    No, the world does not need two standards and the IPS WG should force the
    issue.  While companies will always do their own, the mission of a standard
    committee is to find one and only one standard to make everyone's life
    easier.  Failing to do so does not serve this community.
    
    If FCIP is good enough, why do I need iFCP?  Do I really need the
    scalability of 4 billion fibre channel nodes visible to me?  For Internet
    domain names I may need IPv6, but, for storage devices?  24-bits of D_ID
    with 16 million nodes are a lot of addresses.  I do understand perfectly if
    one wishes to dominate the FC switch market.  As a consumer, this is not my
    concern unless one can provide me alternatives with a much lower costs.
    
    As a customer, all I care is to have the ability to access storage devices
    on IP network at lower cost.  I don't care the standard as long as there is
    one that gives me choices of low-cost vendors.  Many people even believe
    among the networks of Ethernet, Fibre Channel, and InfiniBand, there will be
    only one winner.   Therefore, among iFCP, FCIP, and iSCSI, please give me
    just one.  Having said that, I do believe we need fibre channel before
    Ethernet folks taking over the world while InfiniBand lurks on the horizon.
    ISA was wonderful until EISA comes along.  VESA was great until PCI appears.
    Now PCI-X and InfiniBand. We all suffer through technology transitions.
    Therefore, the last thing we need is to have another standard even before we
    start.  Don't repeat VHS and Beta.  I still have a lots of tapes in Beta
    format.
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:05:57 2001
6315 messages in chronological order