Re: IETF Draft for VI/TCP

[Yaron Klein <klein@sanrad.com>]

I'll oppose to that.

I agree that WG *decisions* should be carried in consensus
within the formal WG meetings.

However, there are many issues that needs to b discussed and
so many views that needs to be explained.

I think that such face-to-face meeting is a great opportunity
to hear the others.

A meeting that is *open* to *all* of the community can only assist.
Frankly, going all the way to Pittsburgh for 2 hours only, is a little
bit of a waste - for someone whose main interest is Storage...

    Regards,

        Y. Klein


David Robinson wrote:

> I would like to oppose this as it is not the IETF way of doing
> business.  I would like to participate but there are also other
> WGs I need to attend and have scheduled travel around them.
> Last minute changes to the agenda really screws things up.
>
> Why can't we just bash things out on the WG alias so all
> can participate?
>
>         -David Robinson
>
> julian_satran@il.ibm.com wrote:
> >
> > David,
> >
> > Can we get a room for some face-to-face design team meetings in Pittsburgh.
> > If would be a vaste not to use the week to make some progress on some open
> > issues.
> > We can keep them widely open although I assume that they will not be as
> > widely attended as the formal session.
> >
> > On site is convenient as people can slip in-and-out and attend some other
> > sessions too. If we do make our private arrangements that would be more
> > difficult.