Who is doing what

["Cameron, Don" <don.cameron@intel.com>]

I am trying to figure out who the players are in the storage over IP arena.
>From following the discussions here, and reading the trade rags, I have come
up with the following. Please let me know where I am wrong:

The IP Storage Working Group (IBM, Cisco, HP, Adaptec, Quantum, EMC, and
others) 
	Mapping of SCSI to TCP. All agree that TCP is appropriate for WAN. A
majority advocate TCP for both LAN and WAN, a minority advocate a
lighter-weight transport protocol for LAN only.

Adaptec: EtherStorage
	Mapping of SCSI to light-weight transport protocol specifically
designed for LAN only. Uses SEP (SCSI Encapsulation Protocol).

Nishan: SoIP (Storage Over IP)
	Can't find much detail here.

Gadzoox and Lucent:
	Fibre Channel over IP. Proposal is to use IP to bridge between FC
SANs for MANs (and WANs?).

SAN, Ltd: SSCOP (Service Specific Connection Oriented Protocol)
	Route storage data over IP (UDP?) using the data link protocol from
ATM that allows selective re-transmission.