SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: response to second login (with same ISID)


    • To: "Santosh Rao" <santoshr@cup.hp.com>
    • Subject: RE: iSCSI: response to second login (with same ISID)
    • From: "Lakshmi Ramasubramanian" <nramas@windows.microsoft.com>
    • Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:27:54 -0700
    • Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    • content-class: urn:content-classes:message
    • Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    • Content-Type: text/plain;charset="US-ASCII"
    • Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    • Thread-Index: AcDlgE4BWPopcbbmR5yPqt5Y7gIsbAAfvdCw
    • Thread-Topic: iSCSI: response to second login (with same ISID)

    Even if the target is capable of supporting multiple initiators, won't
    it cause problems
    with devices such as disk - say, filesystem from the two initiators'
    side attempt to write 
    to the same sectors (even not intentionally) would cause data
    corruption. Is iSCSI layer
    suppose to guard against this type of device sharing? 
    
    But, if the target serializes access to the device by reserve\release,
    it would avoid
    conflict. Is that how it's suppose to work? 
    
    Thanks!
     -lakshmi
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Santosh Rao [mailto:santoshr@cup.hp.com] 
    Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 6:09 PM
    To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
    Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject: Re: iSCSI: response to second login (with same ISID)
    
    
    
    Why would the target want to reject the login, unless it is not capable
    of [or does not wish to] speak to multiple initiators ?
    
    In the case of most targets, they should be capable of handling multiple
    initiators and therefore, should accept the login.
    
    If the target is incapable of supporting multiple initiators or does not
    wish to allow multiple initiators (ex : iSCSI tape drive preventing
    concurrent access), then, it can reject the login with a status
    class/response of 0x0205. (Target Conflict).
    
    - Santosh
    
    
    Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
    > 
    > How is a target driver suppose to respond to a login from an 
    > initiator, when another initiator already has a session going on with 
    > the given target? Is the target
    > suppose to reject the second login (say, with an error "device busy"
    or
    > something simialar)?
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:36 2001
6315 messages in chronological order