SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: Protocol Action: iSCSI to Proposed Standard



    > All the Internet documentation with which I am familiar, as well as the
    
    I think we have a case of overlapping vocabulary from two different domains.
    
    Per SCSI Architecture Model (SAM-2, SAM-3), iSCSI is very clearly
    a "SCSI transport protocol" (as opposed to a SCSI application layer protocol).
    Parallel SCSI, Fibre Channel etc. are all "SCSI transports" per SCSI conventions.
    That is all the critiqued abstract is trying to describe.
    --
    Mallikarjun
    
    Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
    Networked Storage Architecture
    Network Storage Solutions
    Hewlett-Packard MS 5668 
    Roseville CA 95747
    cbm@rose.hp.com
    
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Bob Braden" <braden@ISI.EDU>
    To: <sob@harvard.edu>; <mankin@psg.com>
    Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; <ietf@ietf.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:48 PM
    Subject: Re: Protocol Action: iSCSI to Proposed Standard
    
    
    > 
    >   *> 
    >   *> The IESG has approved publishing the following Internet-Draft
    >   *> as a Proposed Standard:
    >   *> 
    >   *> o iSCSI <draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-20.txt>
    >   *> 
    >   *> This document is the product of the IP Storage Working Group.
    >   *> 
    >   *> The IESG contact persons are Allison Mankin and Scott Bradner.
    >   *> 
    >   *>  
    >   *> Technical Summary
    >   *>  
    >   *>  The Small Computer Systems Interface (SCSI) is a family of
    >   *>  protocols for communicating with I/O devices, especially storage
    >   *>  devices. SCSI is a client-server architecture. The SCSI protocol
    >   *>  has been mapped over various transports, including Parallel SCSI,
    > 
    > Transports?
    > 
    > The Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines the noun "transport" as
    > "strong and often intensely pleasurable emotion".  ;-)
    > 
    > All the Internet documentation with which I am familiar, as well as the
    > OSI reference model, define a "transport layer", but I don't think you
    > are suggesting SCSI over IP, etc.
    > 
    > Can't we please resist terminology pollution?  In the IETF we call these
    > [data] link layers.
    > 
    > Bob Braden
    > 
    >   *>  IPI, IEEE-1394 (firewire) and Fibre Channel. These transports are
    >   *>  I/O specific and have limited distance capabilities. The iSCSI
    >   *>  protocol defined in draft-ietf-ips-iscsi describes a means of
    >   *>  transporting of the SCSI packets over TCP/IP, providing for an
    >   *>  interoperable solution which can take advantage of existing
    >   *>  Internet infrastructure, Internet management facilities and
    >   *>  address distance limitations. Mapping over TCP ensures that the
    >   *>  high volume storage transfers use congestion control.
    >   *> 
    >   *>  
    > 
    
    


Home

Last updated: Fri Feb 14 02:19:11 2003
12307 messages in chronological order