RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ips-scsi-mib-04.txt

[Paul Koning <ni1d@arrl.net>]

>>>>> "Amir" == Amir Shalit <amir@astutenetworks.com> writes:

 Amir> I have two comments: 1) Read/Write counters

 Amir> Counter32 (counting MB transferred) wrap at about 1000 hours on
 Amir> 10Gbps links. Can we the MIB use a Counter64 instead?

Makes sense to me.

 Amir> 2) Virtualization

 Amir> An attempt was made to list all LU's which are part of a LUN.
 Amir> In my opinion, the ultimate mechanism to represent hierarchical
 Amir> volumes is via a volume manager MIB. For the time being it will
 Amir> be useful to associate a {start LBA, end LBA} vector with each
 Amir> LU to allow for most simplistic virtualization mapping.

I don't like this idea at all.  Let's keep that stuff out of this MIB.

  paul