SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call



    I object.
    The FCIP group discussed this issue and agreed that SLPv2 was to be used for
    FCIP Entity discovery.
    As such, the recently completed FCIP draft contains no mention of iSNS
    support.
    A single dynamic discovery protocol is needed and its SLPv2.
    
    ...dap
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
    > Anil Rijhsinghani
    > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:05 AM
    > To: 'Joshua Tseng'; ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > Subject: RE: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call
    >
    >
    > Joshua:
    >
    > Unless there are objections, it would be useful to add those hooks as an
    > option. In an environment where both FCIP and iSCSI are in use,
    > and iSNS is
    > available, it may help to keep down the number of discovery protocols that
    > need to be managed by the user. Either SLP could be used for
    > both, or iSNS.
    >
    > Anil
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Joshua Tseng [mailto:jtseng@NishanSystems.com]
    > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:08 PM
    > To: Anil Rijhsinghani; Black_David@emc.com; ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > Subject: RE: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call
    >
    >
    > Anil,
    >
    > It would be very easy, especially now that Portals can be
    > members of Discovery Domains.  All we would need to do is
    > to add a new Entity Protocol type (FCIP = 3).  FCIP connectivity
    > would then be established based on Portal membership in
    > Discovery Domains.  Other than that, we would just new narative
    > text describing how you use iSNS to set up FCIP sessions.
    >
    > Please let me know if this is desireable for the FCIP folks.
    >
    > Josh
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Anil Rijhsinghani [mailto:anil.rijhsinghani@mcdata.com]
    > > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:43 PM
    > > To: 'Black_David@emc.com'; ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > > Subject: RE: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call
    > >
    > >
    > > How hard would it be to add hooks for optional FCIP support
    > > in iSNS? It
    > > currently supports only iFCP and iSCSI.
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > > Anil
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com]
    > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 10:07 AM
    > > To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    > > Subject: IPS-ALL: iSNS WG Last Call
    > >
    > >
    > > All,
    > >
    > > We would like to announce IPS Working Group Last call for
    > > the Internet Storage Name Service (iSNS).
    > >
    > > Details:
    > >
    > > Document: Internet Storage Name Service (iSNS)
    > > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ips-isns-13.txt
    > > Note: There are formatting (line length) problems with this draft.
    > > 	It may get updated to -14 shortly to correct them without
    > > 	change to its content.
    > >
    > > Last call period: 2 Weeks
    > > Submit comments no later than: Sunday, October 13, 2002 at 5pm EST
    > > Editor:  Josh Tseng <jtseng@nishansystems.com>
    > >
    > > Please submit editorial comments directly to Josh, with copy
    > > to David Black
    > > (black_david@emc.com), and Elizabeth Rodriguez(erodrigu@brocade.com)
    > > Submit technical comments to the IPS mailing list (ips@ece.cmu.edu)
    > >
    > > Editorial comments may be resolved directly by the editor of
    > > the document,
    > > but any technical issues must be discussed on the IPS reflector.
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > David Black & Elizabeth Rodriguez
    > > IPS co-chairs
    > >
    > > ---------------------------------------------------
    > > David L. Black, Senior Technologist
    > > EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
    > > +1 (508) 249-6449            FAX: +1 (508) 497-8018
    > > black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
    > > ---------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > >
    > > ===========================================================
    > > Notice
    > >
    > > All information transmitted hereby is intended only for the use of the
    > > addressee(s) named above and may contain confidential and privileged
    > > information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
    > > distribution is
    > > prohibited.  If the reader of this message is not the
    > > intended recipient(s)
    > > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
    > > intended recipient(s), you may not distribute or copy this
    > > communication to
    > > another.  Anyone who receives this communication in error
    > > should notify us
    > > immediately by telephone and mail the original message to us
    > > at the above
    > > address and destroy all copies.
    > > ===========================================================
    > >
    >
    >
    > ===========================================================
    > Notice
    >
    > All information transmitted hereby is intended only for the use of the
    > addressee(s) named above and may contain confidential and privileged
    > information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
    > prohibited.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
    > recipient(s)
    > or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
    > intended recipient(s), you may not distribute or copy this
    > communication to
    > another.  Anyone who receives this communication in error should notify us
    > immediately by telephone and mail the original message to us at the above
    > address and destroy all copies.
    > ===========================================================
    
    


Home

Last updated: Wed Oct 09 07:18:56 2002
11931 messages in chronological order