RE: iSCSI: Question about ErrorRecoveryLevel

[Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@wasabisystems.com>]

On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 Black_David@emc.com wrote:

> One more clarification - in the meeting on Monday (report/results)
> coming to the list shortly the rough consensus in the room was:
>
> - If an implementation wants to support only one of the mechanisms
>     required at ERL1, it's ok to negotiate ERL 0 (can't negotiate
>     1 because that would require both mechanisms) and then try
>     the mechanism of interest, but the implementation MUST be prepared
>     for the attempt to fail because the other party doesn't support it.

Thanks. That addresses the other half of my confusion.

Take care,

Bill