RE: iSCSI - Length and Size

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

David - I disagree - there was no consistency issue with length and size there was only the ease of searching...
I my part of the world using synonyms is still legal and consistent (for how long I can't say).

Julo

David Dillard <david.dillard@veritas.com> 06/25/2002 06:05 PM Please respond to David Dillard

To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL         cc:        ips@ece.cmu.edu         Subject:        RE: iSCSI - Length and Size

The change of size to length was made for the sake of consistency.  Shouldn't the goal be that the document/protocol is totally consistent, not mostly consistent?  Don't go half way...
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:54 AM
To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: iSCSI - Length and Size


I've changed all occurrences of "size" to "length" in the draft. 
Do we want also to change FirstBurstSize and MaxBurstSize to FirstBurstLength and MaxBurstLength? (for good size ... oops ... length) 

Julo