SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: Small editorial update




    Eddy - the text says already  "... the input PDU number" it repeats the sharing statement - I think it has enough to get things clear.
    I have changed bi-directional to bidirectional.

    Julo


    Eddy Quicksall <eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com>

    06/24/2002 04:35 PM
    Please respond to Eddy Quicksall

           
            To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
            cc:        ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
            Subject:        RE: iSCSI: Small editorial update

           


    The 1st paragraph needs a little change too. It implies that a
    bi-directional command must have data-in before data-out. If you had
    data-out first and R2Ts were being used, the DataSN would start with the
    last R2TSN + 1.

    And the 1st paragraph of 9.8.1 should probably say "starting with 0 for
    unidirectional commands" instead of "starting with 0".

    Also, SAM-2 uses the term "bidirectional" not "bi-directional". Can you
    change that too?

    Eddy

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
    Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:07 AM
    To: John Hufferd
    Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject: Re: iSCSI: Small editorial update



    OK - Julo


    |---------+---------------------------->
    |         |           "John Hufferd"   |
    |         |           <hufferd@us.ibm.c|
    |         |           om>              |
    |         |           Sent by:         |
    |         |           owner-ips@ece.cmu|
    |         |           .edu             |
    |         |                            |
    |         |                            |
    |         |           06/24/2002 12:34 |
    |         |           AM               |
    |         |           Please respond to|
    |         |           "John Hufferd"   |
    |         |                            |
    |---------+---------------------------->

    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------|
     |
    |
     |       To:       "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
    |
     |       cc:       ips@ece.cmu.edu
    |
     |       Subject:  iSCSI: Small editorial update
    |
     |
    |
     |
    |

    >---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---------------------------------------|



    Julian,
    I think we need to add a clause that denotes that a bi-directional command
    is being addressed in the second paragraph under 9.7.5 in your working
    draft 14.  We should add the expression ", in the context of bidirectional
    commands, ".  The following would be the revised paragraph.

    "R2T and Data-In PDUs, in the context of bi-directional commands, share the
    numbering sequence (see Section 2.2.2.3 Data Sequencing)."

    I know it should be obvious when one really thinks about it, however,  it
    make the intent easier to understand.

    .
    .
    .
    John L. Hufferd
    Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
    Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702
    Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com









Home

Last updated: Mon Jun 24 13:18:44 2002
10959 messages in chronological order