SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI-Asynch event code



    
    Why is this needed ? The target can just send an async event to drop the
    connection or request a connection logout, and the connection can be
    re-established allowing for new negotiation.
    
    I don't see the point of making this change so late in the game. There
    exist mechanisms such as target driven connection logout/drop which can
    be used to achieve the same effect.
    
    In any case, what do you do if the initiator does not respond with a
    text message ? The target would end up dropping the cxn with an async
    message in this case, causing a re-login and thus, re-negotiation.
    
    To summarize, I don't see a need for this change, since there are
    simpler mechanisms to achieve the same effect. In particular, given that
    we are so close to the finish line, I suggest that we not make this
    change, but instead, use the async cxn/ssn logout/drop mechanisms.
    
    Rgds,
    Santosh
    
    
    Julian Satran wrote:
    > 
    > Dear colleagues,
    > 
    > I plan to add to the text in 9.9.1 an additional event code as
    > follows. It is needed for completeness.
    > 
    > 4 - target requests parameter negotiation on this connection. The
    > initiator MUST honor this request by issuing a Text Request (that can
    > be empty) on the same connection as early as possible unless a Text
    > Request is already pending on the connection or by issuing a Logout
    > Request.
    > Julo
    
    -- 
    The world is so fast that there are days when the person who says 
    it can't be done is interrupted by the person who is doing it.
    	~ Anon
    


Home

Last updated: Wed Jun 12 17:18:44 2002
10720 messages in chronological order