SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: Negotiation clarifications still needed



    
    I take it that we are all happy with the current C bit stuff (if it also is
    in Login).  I think that is the hand off token.
    
    .
    .
    .
    John L. Hufferd
    Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
    Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702
    Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
    
    
    pat_thaler@agilent.com@ece.cmu.edu on 05/29/2002 04:15:57 PM
    
    Sent by:    owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    
    
    To:    wrstuden@wasabisystems.com, pat_thaler@agilent.com
    cc:    Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, cbm@rose.hp.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu,
           mkrikis@yahoo.com
    Subject:    RE: iSCSI: Negotiation clarifications still needed
    
    
    
    
    From: Bill Studenmund
    <snip>
    What do we want to decide?
    
    Bill,
    
    As I mention in the response to John, I would like to see proposed text for
    specifying the hand-off.
    
    I think one could approach this by handing back and forth the right to make
    negotiation offers and leave to the implementations whether they send empty
    text negotiations or responses and declarations when they don't have the
    right to make negotiation offers. I think the hand-off should be based on a
    bit flag rather than based on whether the last PDU received ended in a
    complete key-value pair.
    
    Once people have had a chance to see the proposal, I would like to hear
    opinions beyond those of the few people who have been active in this
    discussion.
    
    Regards,
    Pat
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Thu May 30 00:18:46 2002
10412 messages in chronological order