Re: [iSCSI:] Logout request -- reason? Correction

[Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>]

pat_thaler@agilent.com wrote:
> 
> Luben,
> 
> I don't see where you got that impression. The BHS layout shows bytes 1 through
> 3 as opcode specific fields. The kinds of opcode specific fields will be different
> depending upon opcode.


Pat,

I KNOW about the BHS template.

If you had read my mail carefully you'd notice that
I mention that putting a bit value _and_ a numeric
value in the same octet is not a sound architectural idea.

Then you'd deduce that since the F bit is used in _that_
PDU, it'd be a good idea to leave the rest 7 bits
be bits (thus making one octet) and use the _next_ _whole_
_empty_ _reserved_ octet for the status/response code.

Certainly everyone else understood what I meant.

And the objection was _not_ your argument, but
the fact that we are running out of time.

-- 
Luben