Re: [iSCSI:] Logout request -- reason? Correction

[Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>]

John Hufferd wrote:
> 
> There is nothing broken here, this is preference.  I see no reason to move
> it again.  Julian, did announce it and we accepted it.
> We should be moving towards closure.
> 

Paul Koning wrote:
> 
> I objected before and I'll object again.
> 
> It would be very nice if we could stop making gratuitous changes to
> packet formats and get the spec finished instead.

In other words you have no problem with those changes
taking place, you simply oppose to them, lest the
PDU format become more object oriented friendly.

The people in C wouldn't mind that much since they are used to
dealing with bit shifting and what not, but the people in
C++ where this inconsistency would mean an ugly base class,
and an unbecoming implementation would cringe at the look of it.

You should've at least recognised that this would
be a _good_ architectural change, and then give your reasons
for _not_ implementing it, rather than calling them
``gratuitous changes''.

I'm not posting here out of whim -- I really do care.

-- 
Luben