RE: iSCSI: Range Separator

["Somesh Gupta" <somesh_gupta@silverbacksystems.com>]

We must really be close to getting done!!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
> Julian Satran
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:35 AM
> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE: iSCSI: Range Separator
>
>
>
> ... and the winner is tilde (0x7e) - Julo
>
> End-of-Thread (hopefully!)
>
>
>
>
>                       "Rod Harrison"
>
>                       <rod.harrison@win        To:
> "LEMAY,KEVIN (A-Roseville,ex1)"
>                       driver.com>
> <kevin_lemay@agilent.com>, Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
>                                                cc:
> <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
>                       21-03-02 19:06           Subject:  RE:
> iSCSI: Range Seperator
>                       Please respond to
>
>                       "Rod Harrison"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>              I don't care what the character is since the focus is to make
> this
> easy to parse, and not human readable. So to that end consider my vote
> to be for whichever of the single characters is nearest to winning.
> ;-)
>
>              However, if we do have to pay some mind to
> aesthetics then how
> about
> the < character? So we would have MyKey=3<65,93<123
>
>              - Rod
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
> LEMAY,KEVIN (A-Roseville,ex1)
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:20 PM
> To: 'Julian Satran'
> Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE: Range Seperator
>
>
> I do not like the ';' but I would prefer a single character. There
> have been
> objections to using the comma or colon, then my third choice is the
> ".."
>
> I really don't see any conflict using either the comma or colon.
>
> Using comma is already used to separate list values. Colon being used
> in
> addresses is irrelevant because those are different parameters. I
> certainly
> keep track of which one we are working on.
>
> Kevin Lemay
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:47 AM
> To: Rod Harrison
> Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE:
>
>
>
> I was looking at what would be appropriate (and perhaps familiar to
> programmers - double dot is used in Pascal for ranges).  (- or +) may
> come
> handy later for other things. And BTW double characters are already
> there in
> addresses.
> We could use semicolon(;) (I for some reason do not like it).
>
> So we have 2 proposals:
>
> 1) .. (2 votes)
> 2); (1 vote?)
>
> The tally is on! (untill tomorrow)
>
> Julo
>
>
>
>
>
>              "Rod Harrison" <rod.harrison@windriver.com>
>
>
> 21-03-02 02:04
> Please respond to "Rod Harrison"
>
>
>
>         To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
>         cc:
>         Subject:        RE:
>
>
>
>
>
>                 I would prefer one character. I don't care what it is,
> any
> character
> will do, but having only one there is slightly easier to parse that
> having two.
>
>                 - Rod
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of
> Julian Satran
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:05 PM
> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject:
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I suggested using : (colon) to separate values in a range.
> Unfortunately :
> is overused (in addresses and in names).
> I suggest we use the (old) two dots (..) to mark a range.
>
> Comments?
> Julo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>