SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Use of the A bit




    John,

    comments in text - JUlo


    John Hufferd/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS

    18-03-02 19:17
    Please respond to John Hufferd

           
            To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
            cc:        "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>, ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
            Subject:        Re: iSCSI: Use of the A bit

           



    Julian the following statement is confusing:

    "An initiator MUST ONLY acknowledge the status for command that produced
    Data-In PDUs after acknowledging the Data-In PDUs if Data-In PDU
    acknowledgment is requested by the target.  A status acknowledgement for a
    command that generated Data-In PDUs is considered by the target as an
    implicit acknowledgement of the Data-In PDUs if such an acknowledgement
    was requested by the target."

    What did you intend to say.  All commands MUST have t status acknowledge,
    via ExpStatSN, so I do not understand the first sentence.  And if the
    Data-In PDUs must be acknowledged (if the A bit is set), what is the
    meaning of the last statement.

    +++ The first statement says that IF data-ack is requested it MUST be sent by the initiator before it acknowledges status.
    +++

    Since I do not believe there is a need to ack the last Data-In PDU, I am
    hoping you agree.  But it is not clear.


    +++
    In fact the target may want a data ack as the status ack might be delayed for various reasons.
    The second statement says that if the target sees a status ack that is also an ack for the data

    The first statement says that the initiator must send ack if asked - and send status ack only afterwards.

    The second says that when status is received the data are acked and target should wait no longer (i.e., no recovery action).
    +++
    If the Target sets the A bit on the last Data-In PDU, which also has good
    status set -- and the Initiator has a PDU ready to send to which it can
    attach the value of ExpStatSN, which will show that the Data-In PDU was
    received -- there should be no reason to send a extra SNACK for the Data-In
    PDU.

    Please tell me that is what you intended to say in the above quoted text.


    .
    .
    .
    John L. Hufferd
    Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
    Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702
    Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com


    "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 03/17/2002
    05:52:46 PM

    Sent by:    owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


    To:    "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>
    cc:    ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject:    Re: iSCSI: Use of the A bit



    Dear all,

    The text for the A bit part (9.7.2) reads now:

      A (Acknowledge) bit


          For sessions with ErrorRecoveryLevel 1 or higher, the target sets
          this bit to 1 to indicate that it requests a positive
          acknowledgement from the initiator for the data received.  The
          target should use the A bit moderately; it MAY set the A bit to 1
          only once every MaxBurstSize bytes or on the last Data-In PDU that
          concludes the entire requested read data transfer for the task from
          the target's perspective, and MUST NOT do so more frequently than
          this.

          On receiving a Data-In PDU with the A bit set to 1, the initiator
          MUST issue a SNACK of type DataACK.  If the initiator has detected
          holes in the input sequence, it MUST postpone issuing the SNACK of
          type DataACK until the holes are filled. An initiator MUST ONLY
          acknowledge the status for command that produced Data-In PDUs after
          acknowledging the Data-In PDUs if Data-In PDU acknowledgment is
          requested by the target. A status acknowledgement for a command that
          generated Data-In PDUs is considered by the target as an implicit
          acknowledgement of the Data-In PDUs if such an acknowledgement was
          requested by the target.

    The ITT mandating text in 9,16.1 will read:

          For Status SNACK and DataACK, the Initiator Task Tag is reserved. In

           all other cases, the Initiator Task Tag field MUST be set to the
          Ini-tiator Task Tag of the referenced command.


          Julo








Home

Last updated: Mon Mar 18 17:18:19 2002
9184 messages in chronological order