SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Use of the A bit



    
    Julian the following statement is confusing:
    
     "An initiator MUST ONLY acknowledge the status for command that produced
     Data-In PDUs after acknowledging the Data-In PDUs if Data-In PDU
     acknowledgment is requested by the target.  A status acknowledgement for a
     command that generated Data-In PDUs is considered by the target as an
     implicit acknowledgement of the Data-In PDUs if such an acknowledgement
     was requested by the target."
    
    What did you intend to say.  All commands MUST have t status acknowledge,
    via ExpStatSN, so I do not understand the first sentence.  And if the
    Data-In PDUs must be acknowledged (if the A bit is set), what is the
    meaning of the last statement.
    
    Since I do not believe there is a need to ack the last Data-In PDU, I am
    hoping you agree.  But it is not clear.
    
    If the Target sets the A bit on the last Data-In PDU, which also has good
    status set -- and the Initiator has a PDU ready to send to which it can
    attach the value of ExpStatSN, which will show that the Data-In PDU was
    received -- there should be no reason to send a extra SNACK for the Data-In
    PDU.
    
    Please tell me that is what you intended to say in the above quoted text.
    
    
    .
    .
    .
    John L. Hufferd
    Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
    Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702
    Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
    
    
    "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 03/17/2002
    05:52:46 PM
    
    Sent by:    owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    
    
    To:    "Mallikarjun C." <cbm@rose.hp.com>
    cc:    ips@ece.cmu.edu, owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject:    Re: iSCSI: Use of the A bit
    
    
    
    Dear all,
    
    The text for the A bit part (9.7.2) reads now:
    
       A (Acknowledge) bit
    
    
           For sessions with ErrorRecoveryLevel 1 or higher, the target sets
           this bit to 1 to indicate that it requests a positive
           acknowledgement from the initiator for the data received.  The
           target should use the A bit moderately; it MAY set the A bit to 1
           only once every MaxBurstSize bytes or on the last Data-In PDU that
           concludes the entire requested read data transfer for the task from
           the target's perspective, and MUST NOT do so more frequently than
           this.
    
           On receiving a Data-In PDU with the A bit set to 1, the initiator
           MUST issue a SNACK of type DataACK.  If the initiator has detected
           holes in the input sequence, it MUST postpone issuing the SNACK of
           type DataACK until the holes are filled. An initiator MUST ONLY
           acknowledge the status for command that produced Data-In PDUs after
           acknowledging the Data-In PDUs if Data-In PDU acknowledgment is
           requested by the target. A status acknowledgement for a command that
           generated Data-In PDUs is considered by the target as an implicit
           acknowledgement of the Data-In PDUs if such an acknowledgement was
           requested by the target.
    
    The ITT mandating text in 9,16.1 will read:
    
           For Status SNACK and DataACK, the Initiator Task Tag is reserved. In
           all other cases, the Initiator Task Tag field MUST be set to the
           Ini-tiator Task Tag of the referenced command.
    
    
           Julo
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Mon Mar 18 13:18:16 2002
9179 messages in chronological order