SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: LUN in Data-out and NOP PDU's



    
    1) Can someone please give an example of how the LUN would be used in
    a NOP PDU.
    2) If the NOP-In is used as a ping, the TTT is set to a valid value
    and the LUN must be set to a correct value when the TTT is valid. But,
    if the ping comes from the target (not an LU), then what should the
    LUN contain?
    
    Eddy
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Sanjay Goyal [mailto:sanjay_goyal@ivivity.com]
    Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 1:38 PM
    To: Eddy Quicksall
    Subject: FW: iSCSI: LUN in Data-out and NOP PDU's
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
    Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:17 AM
    To: Sanjay Goyal
    Subject: RE: iSCSI: LUN in Data-out and NOP PDU's
    
    
    
    Sanjay,
    
    I am not sure I understand you question.
    The NOPs follow the pattern of all other target to initiator PDUs that
    expect a follow-up action (like R2T) when they do.
    For this they use TTT+LUN.
    
    If they are originated or not at the LU or a front-end device is an
    "implementation detail".
    
    Julo
    
    
    
    
                        Sanjay Goyal
    
                        <sanjay_goyal@iv       To:     Julian
    Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Eddy Quicksall
                        ivity.com>
    <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
    
                                               cc:     "'ips@ece.cmu.edu'"
    <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
                        27-12-01 18:09         Subject:     RE: iSCSI: LUN
    in Data-out and NOP PDU's
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hi
    to be very specific on the question,
     Nop-out and Nop-in PDUs are used by Initiators and Targets also to
    ping
    each other. If a target is trying to ping the Initiator, why does it
    need
    to use a particular combination of TTT and LUN i.e. the "virtual
    target".
    Should we really use TTT and LUN pair for a function which is for
    target
    and not for "virtual target"  OR am i missing something.
    
    Regards
    Sanjay Goyal
         -----Original Message-----
         From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
         Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 3:37 AM
         To: Eddy Quicksall
         Cc: ips@ece. cmu. edu (E-mail); owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
         Subject: Re: iSCSI: LUN in Data-out and NOP PDU's
    
    
         Eddy,
    
         It was felt that TTT management could be kept local to the LU or
    group
         of LUs (no requirement to be unique on target).
         The combination LU and TTT is used instead. That enables groups
    of
         entities to form a "virtual target".
    
         Julo
    
    
    
       "Eddy Quicksall"
    
       <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>            To:        "ips@ece. cmu.
    
       Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu  edu \(E-mail\)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    
                                               cc:
    
                                               Subject:        iSCSI: LUN
    
       21-12-01 22:38                  in Data-out and NOP PDU's
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
         What is the LUN for in Data-out and NOP-out PDU's?
    
    
         I assume the LUN in Data-out could be used for steering but I
    don't
         know what the LUN in NOP-out PDU's is for.
    
    
         Eddy
    
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Fri Dec 28 15:17:41 2001
8211 messages in chronological order