|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: iscsi : DataPDULength can differ in each direction.
Dave,
Implementation specific? I assume you wanted to say connection specific.
No the parameters you quote (except MaxOutstandingR2T) are not connection
specific.
They reflect multiplexing capability that the transport allows for SCSI.
Making them connection specific will
only complicate things with no added benefit.
MaxOutstandingR2T might be viewed as a way to compensate for RTT bu depend
also on handling capabilities
of the end-points.
Julo
Dave Sheehy
<dbs@acropora.rose.ag To: ips@ece.cmu.edu (IETF IP SAN Reflector)
ilent.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: iscsi : DataPDULength can differ in
owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu each direction.
05-10-01 22:44
Please respond to
Dave Sheehy
> Having now accepted that DataPDULength is a "maximum receive pdu length"
> limitation that each end point is allowed to express, this key needs to
> be on a per connection basis, and not a per session basis.
>
> The reason for this being that limitations on DataPDULength (more aptly,
> max receive pdu length) stem from implementation specific quirks. (One
> of the reasons for allowing this feature, in the first place.).
Following this same line of reasoning the keys:
MaxBurstSize
FirstBurstSize
MaxOutstandingR2T
DataPDUInOrder
DataSequenceInOrder
ErrorRecoveryLevel
are all potentially implementation specific and should not be categorized
as LO.
Dave
Home Last updated: Mon Oct 08 08:17:28 2001 7118 messages in chronological order |