Re: [Fwd: iscsi : task mgmt response codes.]

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

Santosh,

Sorry for not answering explicitly - I was overwhelmed. The text in 08 has an additional statement that might help clarify:

For additional usage semantics, see section 8.1.

Regards,
Julo

Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com> Sent by: santoshr@cup.hp.com 01-10-01 21:54 Please respond to Santosh Rao

To:        Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL         cc:                 Subject:        [Fwd: iscsi : task mgmt response codes.]

Julian,

I did'nt hear back from you on the below issue. I look forward to your
comments on the same.

Thanks,
Santosh


Santosh Rao wrote:
> 
> Hi Julian,
> 
> A couple of comments on the task management response codes in Section
> 3.6 of Rev 7.97 :
> 
> 1)I suggest that a 1-sentence description accompany the definition of
> each response code in all locations where response/status codes are
> defined. This helps clarify their usage, since the intended usage may
> not always be obvious from the response code itself.
> 
> Ex : the usage of the following is not obvious from a reading of section
> 3.6 :
> 3 - Task still allegiant
> 4 - Task failover not supported
> 5 - Task in progress
> 
> Where appropriate, a forward reference would also help, in cases such as
> "task still allegiant".
> 
> 2) I suggest that a task management response code be added to indicate
> "Function Not Supported" to respond to task mgmt requests that the
> target may not support. (ex : target reset).
> 
> Thanks,
> Santosh


-- 
##################################
Santosh Rao
Software Design Engineer,
HP-UX iSCSI Driver Team,
Hewlett Packard, Cupertino.
email : santoshr@cup.hp.com
Phone : 408-447-3751
##################################