SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: Naming and Discovery Team Formed



    Doug,
    Maybe I missed something along the way, but is it not the purpose
    of the N&D team to ask and answer the types of questions you raised
    and to produce a draft to address them?
    
    The WG has to provide an answer to the problem of N&D, even if the
    answer is determined to have already been answered by an another group, 
    we still need to have a draft to explain the decision.
    
    To get to an RFC we need a draft, to get a draft we need to have a
    proposal to discuss, to have a proposal we need to have a team to 
    propose one, John has announced the formation of a team. So what is
    your point?
    
    	-David
    
    Douglas Otis wrote:
    > 
    > John,
    > 
    > With your technical hat on, if speed is important why re-invent existing
    > protocols?  Authentication will access a database external to the transport
    > and devices which will easily provide required addressing.  The SCSI name
    > server effort is to include text strings within transport management
    > requests.  This is based on an assumption text is a universal standard
    > whereas numbers change, i.e. DNS with respect to IP for HTTP.  Is there a
    > general assumption SCSI will operate in an open and unauthenticated manner
    > similar to HTTP?  Will there be established a consortium for registering
    > SCSI names?  As authentication is essential to SCSI access, could you
    > provide a technical reason for this naming effort?
    > 
    > SCSI standards groups provide unique numbers rather than text strings to
    > locate media.  The user is the universal standard with respect to
    > authentication and SCSI unique numbers associated with the user at the time
    > of authentication defines a numeric path.  A schema within LDAP can provide
    > these associations and not compromise security as would management text
    > strings.  Even if the internal network was IB, a number or perhaps several
    > is always suitable.  What are the problems being solved by this naming
    > effort?  Why is authentication not being considered first?
    > 
    > Doug
    > 
    > > With my TC Hat on:
    > > I am announcing the formation of a Naming and Discovery Team.  The team
    > > members are:
    > >
    > > Jack Harwood, Joe Czap, Kaladhar Voruganti, Howard Hall, Mark
    > > Bakke, Joshua
    > > Tseng, V.Sairam, Yaron Klein, Lawrence J. Lamers,  &Jim Hafner.
    > >
    > > Kaladhar Voruganti will be the Editor, and Lead for the first Draft.
    > >
    > > We are all looking forward to their effort, and hope they can do some
    > > speedy work.
    > >
    > > Hat off.
    > >
    > > .
    > > .
    > > .
    > > John L. Hufferd
    > > Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
    > > IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
    > > (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403
    > > Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
    > >
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:35 2001
6315 messages in chronological order