SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: FC/IP vs. iSCSI



    Scott,
    
    I will not argue that point.  But my point in that email is not that it
    could not be put integrated onto an end device, but that it is not the
    intent.  The focus is to bridge existing deployments over IP and address
    limitations in the physical media.
    
    Elizabeth
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob@harvard.edu]
    Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 6:15 AM
    To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject: RE: FC/IP vs. iSCSI
    
    
    
    Elizabeth sez:
    > e.g. I would not
    > expect someone to put FC over IP into an end device.  It is really
    intended
    > to be something put into a switch, not at an endpoint. 
    
    I would expect vendors to do anything that they think will sell and
    I expect that some vendors would think that connecting a FC endpoint to
    a FC switch over IP would sell
    
    Scott
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:07:50 2001
6315 messages in chronological order