SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: multiple TCP connections



    
    
    Steve,
    
    Ethernet links are fine between switches and end-points that do this
    multilink.
    On other media (WAN) this is not done.
    Also on Ethernet when you have several NICS host Ethernet drivers have to
    do
    the "striping" (and most don't do it).
    
    Regards,
    Julo
    
    "Steve Byan" <steve_byan@hotmail.com> on 02/08/2000 22:14:22
    
    Please respond to "Steve Byan" <steve_byan@hotmail.com>
    
    To:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
    cc:    (bcc: Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM)
    Subject:  Re: multiple TCP connections
    
    
    
    
    Sorry, I didn't understand TCP multihoming. I've been reading RFC 1122 and
    RFC 1123 and discovered that TCP binds to exactly one of the local
    multihomed addresses, and that TCP applications must choose exactly one of
    the multihomed addresses for the remote host. Multiple sessions starts to
    make much more sense.
    
    I noticed that there is a standard for ethernet link aggregation (IEEE
    802.3ad), and that routers are available that will load-balance over a set
    of links. Given these two, it seems to me that multiple TCP connections
    aren't needed for speed or reliability, assuming ethernet links at the
    end-points. Am I still missing something?
    
    The argument that makes sense to me is that of parallelizing the TCP load
    across multiple hardware accelerators.
    
    Thanks.
    
    Regards,
    -Steve
    
    Steve Byan <stephen.byan@quantum.com>
    
    ________________________________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:08:03 2001
6315 messages in chronological order