Re: Agenda suggestion

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

I'd rather see the security discussion 

the VI/TCP proposals is not a working group item at this point
and security is one of the key issues for the protocol

Scott

---
From owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Thu Jul 27 16:19:05 2000
X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f
From: "Douglas Otis" <dotis@sanlight.net>
To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Subject: Agenda suggestion
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 13:19:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk

As the impact of the VI/TCP proposal will have a significant effect on
security, perhaps a bit more time should be spent with Constantine
Sapuntzakis from Cisco rather than 30 minutes dedicated to Steve Bellovin.
This is provided the co-chair is willing...

30 min  iSCSI Security Requirements (Steve Bellovin, co-chair)
2.5 min   VI/TCP for iSCSI (Constantine Sapuntzakis, Cisco)
	draft-csapuntz-ips-iscsivi-00.txt

Doug