SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI - working draft and IANA



    Julian,
    
    I like the general idea, a couple of comments.
    
    - I assume that it's still the case that new RFCs can define new keys
      without any of the (X#, Y# and Z#) prefixes, if the proposed keys
       are expected to be broadly useful (i.e. beyond a "group of vendors").
       If that's true, then should they be registered into the IANA registry
       as well?
    
    - It appears that the text only appears to require a registry for all
      new keys, but not for what's defined in the iSCSI draft today.  It
      may be useful to include currently defined keys as well, so there's 
      one repository for all keys.  I hope it doesn't lead to any technical 
      delays for the current draft....
    
    Thanks.
    --
    Mallikarjun
    
    Mallikarjun Chadalapaka
    Networked Storage Architecture
    Network Storage Solutions
    Hewlett-Packard MS 5668 
    Roseville CA 95747
    cbm@rose.hp.com
    
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
    To: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
    Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 6:05 AM
    Subject: iSCSI - working draft and IANA
    
    
    > Dear colleagues,
    > 
    > The current (today's) version of the draft has a revised IANA consideration
    > section
    > and specific  indication on how to build keys, authentication methods and
    > digests.
    > 
    > David Black suggested that we might want to go for 3 different registries
    > maintained by IANA for iSCSI
    > and I liked the idea.
    > 
    > Please comment,
    > Julo
    > 
    > 
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Jul 30 10:39:07 2002
11481 messages in chronological order