Re: iSCSI: need for new data SNACK code?

[Dave Sheehy <dbs@acropora.rose.agilent.com>]

Mallikarjun,

> >It is free to segment
> > to any size <= to that and to change that size, for its own purposes, at
> > any point in time w/o notifying the initiator.
> 
> That is correct for the general case, but not for the specific data SNACK
> case under discussion - the spec requires the retransmitted PDUs to be 
> "exact replicas" barring certain header fields, in the absence of a 
> negotiated max PDU size change.

Thanks for the clarification, I missed that when I reviewed the spec 
yesterday but I see it now.

Dave