RE: iSCSI: DLB's [T.6] 2.3 iSCSI Session Types

["John Hufferd" <hufferd@us.ibm.com>]

Marjorie is, in my opinion, correct!

.
.
.
John L. Hufferd
Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
Main Office (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
Home Office (408) 997-6136, Cell: (408) 499-9702
Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com


"KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>@ece.cmu.edu
on 07/11/2002 09:44:19 AM

Sent by:    owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


To:    "Ips Reflector (E-mail)" <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
cc:
Subject:    RE: iSCSI: DLB's [T.6] 2.3  iSCSI Session Types



This "voting" is invalid in the absence of technical debate, and this issue
had sufficient debate and was closed long ago - the decision was "no
support
for long lived discovery sessions".  It's disturbing that this is brought
up
again as if no agreement was reached.  I refer you to the attached email.

Marjorie Krueger
Networked Storage Architecture
Networked Storage Solutions Org.
Hewlett-Packard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kaladhar Voruganti [mailto:kaladhar@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 7:17 AM
> To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: iSCSI: Discovery Session Functionality
>
>
>
>
> This note describes the Naming and Discovery teams's current
> resolution regarding the use of
> NOPs and Asynch messages in the discovery session:
>
> There was no agreement on the need or appropriateness of this
requirement.
> So the general concensus from the Naming and Discovery team, was not to
> add NOPs or any other commands to the Discovery Session.  It will be left
> as only SendTargets can be sent during the Discovery Session.
>
> Kaladhar Voruganti