SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: iSCSI: NOPs on discovery session



    Julian,
     
    I would vote for allowing it. Is the spec going to require the initiator to logout immediately after the SendTargets response is received?. Should the target drop the session after it had sent the response?. I am not sure how the discovery session could be misused. It has been authenticated like any other session and has only limited set of commands. One could also argue the need for logout on a discovery session as opposed to just closing the connection.
     
    -Ayman
     
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu]On Behalf Of Julian Satran
    Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:05 AM
    To: ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject: Re: iSCSI: NOPs on discovery session


    Ayman,

    It is true that I agreed that we may want to have it. However some members of the list have expressed immediately a strong opposition to it claiming that it was no strictly needed (true) and that discovery section are meant to be brief.
    I felt thus that we don't have a consensus on that and we may want to try again.
    I assume that the main concern was that this will enable discovery sessions to be become long lived and be used as a back door monitoring channel.

    Regards,
    Julo



    "Ayman Ghanem" <aghanem@cisco.com>
    Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

    12-04-01 05:30 AM

           
            To:        <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
            cc:        
            Subject:        iSCSI: NOPs on discovery session

           


    Julian,

    I thought we agreed to adding NOPs to the operations allowed on the
    discovery session. I couldn't find that in draft-09. Thanks.

    -Ayman





Home

Last updated: Thu Dec 06 06:17:57 2001
8001 messages in chronological order