SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: FC encapsulation



    I would agree with that.  Might even want to add Bob's explanation to an informative annex, so that if this question comes up again, it will be answered in the doc...
     
    (Personal opinion here -- w/ chair hat off.)
     
    Elizabeth
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Franco Travostino [mailto:travos@nortelnetworks.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:57 PM
    To: Robert Snively; 'Colin Kelly'; ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject: RE: FC encapsulation


    Should we then add a sentence to the 'FC Frame Encapsulation' draft (introduction?) to capture this restricted scope (class 2 & 3)? This scope is somewhat implied in the SOF table (close to the end) but not stated upfront. Like Colin, someone else may be oversold by the title.

    -franco


    At 07:06 PM 10/19/2001, Robert Snively wrote:
    >
    > Is there a fundamental reason why the FC encapsulation draft
    > does not include class 1?  The Fibre Channel standards (as far
    > as I can tell) do not exclude the possibility of allowing
    > class 1 connections through a fabric, so regardless of the intent
    > of the FCIP, IFCP, and mFCP encapsulations, I do not see why
    > this draft should exclude class 1.

    Yes, there really is a fundamental problem.  Class 1 switch
    behavior makes a full bandwidth lossless circuit connection
    between one Fibre Channel node and another.  If you push exactly
    1 Gbit into it, it SHALL push exactly 1 Gbit out, totally in order and
    without loss and with low latency.  It will also change
    from one circuit connection
    to another rather dynamically under Fibre Channel protocol
    control, with extremely low connection latencies.

    TCP/IP simply does not provide those capabilities, so we never
    even considered including it.  Class 6 is a clone of Class 1 in
    those respects.  Class 4 has the same general properties, but
    with clocked fractional bandwidth, so it has the same problems.

    This did not upset most Fibre Channel implementers because all
    the key applications that could truly exploit those additional
    capabilities provided by TCP/IP were all implemented in Class 2
    and in Class 3.  The few highly specialized legacy applications
    that used Class 1 were perfectly happy with no IP connectivity.

    Hope that is some help,

    Bob Snively                        e-mail:    rsnively@brocade.com
    Brocade Communications Systems     phone:  408 487 8135
    1745 Technology Drive
    San Jose, CA 95110


    Franco Travostino, Director Content Internetworking Lab
    Advanced Technology Investments
    Nortel Networks, Inc.
    600 Technology Park
    Billerica, MA 01821 USA
    Tel: 978 288 7708 Fax: 978 288 4690
    email: travos@nortelnetworks.com



Home

Last updated: Tue Oct 23 17:17:33 2001
7348 messages in chronological order