SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: TCP Framing



    Matt,
    
    The tsvwg charter contains the following milestone:
    
    May 01  submit ID on TCP framing by a shim to IESG for
    	consideration as a proposed standard
    
    So, the answer to:
    
    >  Can the iSCSI spec *mandate* the use of this new
    > TSVWG framing RFC in all iSCSI implementations (especially the ones that
    will
    > be complete before this new RFC is even published)? 
    
    should be "YES" because that new RFC is likely to be published
    well before the iSCSI RFC and will be standards track.  This is
    an IETF procedural answer -- RFCs only control the contents
    of implementations that choose to comply to the RFCs, and
    for the example of NT4, that existing code would not comply.
    OTOH, one could ask the Microsoft co-author of the tcpulpframe
    draft about what Microsoft may/might do.
    
    Of course any mandate (tcpulpframe or markers) requires
    rough consensus of the IPS WG.
    
    Thanks,
    --David
    
    ---------------------------------------------------
    David L. Black, Senior Technologist
    EMC Corporation, 42 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
    +1 (508) 435-1000 x75140     FAX: +1 (508) 497-8500
    black_david@emc.com       Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
    ---------------------------------------------------
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:04:41 2001
6315 messages in chronological order