RE: iSCSI Target Reset

[Charles Monia <cmonia@NishanSystems.com>]

Hi:

These seem to be implementation decisions. I don't see how that justifies
removing support from the protocol.

Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hufferd [mailto:hufferd@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: Santosh Rao
> Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: Re: iSCSI Target Reset
> 
> 
> 
> Absolutely not,  Why would we think that impacting 32 different other
> initiators is an OK thing to do.  By the way there are lots 
> more Initiators
> possible with FC on Shark, and would hope that there would be 
> even more
> with iSCSI.
> 
> I have been told that these large Storage Controllers do not 
> support Target
> Reset today.  So I see no loss in not supporting such an item in iSCSI
> especially since many Initiators will be beyond even the distances and
> mischief that is possible with FC.
> 
> .
> .
> .
> John L. Hufferd
> Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
> IBM/SSG San Jose Ca
> (408) 256-0403, Tie: 276-0403,  eFax: (408) 904-4688
> Internet address: hufferd@us.ibm.com
> 
> 
> Santosh Rao <santoshr@cup.hp.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 04/23/2001 
> 01:24:02 PM
> 
> Sent by:  owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
> 
> 
> To:   ips@ece.cmu.edu
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: iSCSI Target Reset
> 
> 
> 
> "Dillard, David" wrote:
> >
> > When will STORPORT be generally available?  The latest 
> STORPORT document
> > that I found on the MS web site is version 0.6a, dated 
> March 18, 2001.
> > Given this it seems like STORPORT might not be available 
> soon.  In that
> case
> > do you know what happens with the current drivers?  Are we 
> going to be
> > telling customers that if they want to use iSCSI and NT 
> clustering they
> have
> > to update to Whistler?
> 
> 
> [One would hope that this list does not turn into a Microsoft
> release/product discussion mailing list (?) ]
> 
> Without going into specifics of A certain O.S., does it suffice to
> require that iSCSI not break existing legacy SCSI applications ?
> 
> If the above is a valid requirement, then, knowing that legacy
> applications continue to use SCSI-2 Reserve/Release and the 
> target reset
> as a mechanism of breaking SCSI-2 reservations, should'nt 
> iSCSI continue
> to support the target reset ?
> 
> - Santosh
> 
> 
> 
>