SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    RE: Concensus Call on Urgent Pointer.



    Daniel,
    
    Sounds reasonable.  I would still like to see the modified API for using the
    UP as specified before this proposal progresses further.  At least the
    default remains no UP unless the request is understood.
    
    Doug
    
    > I'd word it closer to:
    >
    > "During login, if the target reqests use of the Urgent Pointer (UP) then
    > this should be taken as meaning that the target will operate more
    > efficiently when the UP is used.  The initiator should make an
    > effort to use
    > the UP.  If it is unable (or unwilling, because of user intervention*) to
    > use the UP then it must indicate its non-compliance to the target."
    >
    > And so on.
    >
    > The actual Text messages I'd suggest are; (I=initiator, T=target)
    >
    > Text send messages
    >
    > -> UrgentPointerFromInitiator: 1    (to indicate I can send UP)
    > -> UrgentPointerFromTarget: 1       (to indicate I would like T to use UP)
    >
    > Text response messages
    >
    > <- UrgentPointerFromInitiator: 1    (to indicate T wants UP)
    >      or
    > <- UrgentPointerFromInitiator: 0    (to indicate T does not want UP)
    >      or
    > <- (no response)                    (to indicate T did not
    > understand UP rq)
    >
    > <- UrgentPointerFromTarget: 1       (to indicate T will send UP)
    >      or
    > <- UrgentPointerFromTarget: 0       (to indicate T will not send UP)
    >      or
    > <- (no response)                    (to indicate T did not
    > understand UP rq)
    >
    > The default should be TCP normal data (i.e., no UP).
    >
    > Daniel Smith
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > * Maybe a stack on the system is known to fail with UP, or a firewall/QoS
    > router treats bulk urgent data badly.
    > --
    > IBM Almaden Research Center, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099, USA
    > K65B/C2 Phone: +1(408)927-2072 Fax: +1(408)927-3010 Home: +1(408)227-5786
    >
    >
    > Matt Wakeley wrote:
    > >
    > > I think the spec should say:
    > >
    > > "During login, if the target requests use of the Urgent
    > Pointer, then the
    > > initator Must use the Urgent Pointer when
    > > sending data.  If the target does not request use of the Urgent
    > Pointer, then
    > > the initiator Must Not use the Urgent Pointer when sending data."
    > >
    > > and likewise...
    > >
    > > "During login, if the initiator requests use of the Urgent
    > Pointer, then the
    > > target Must use the Urgent Pointer when
    > > sending data.  If the initiator does not request use of the
    > Urgent Pointer,
    > > then the target Must Not use the Urgent Pointer when sending data."
    > >
    > > -Matt
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    
    


Home

Last updated: Tue Sep 04 01:06:23 2001
6315 messages in chronological order