SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    twist on iSCSI asymmetric model



    
    
    
    In the asymmetric model, one TCP connection (the control connection) is
    used for sending all of the commands, thus ensuring ordered delivery of the
    SCSI commands. If (a large amount of) data is also sent on the control
    connection, there is the possibility that the data would fill up the
    window, and critical task management requests couldn't get through.
    
    On the other hand, it has been pointed that some implementations will
    prefer a single (and only) TCP connection for both commands and data.
    
    I would like to suggest the possibility of combining these 2 cases; either
         (1) have a single connection for everything
    or
         (2) have one connection for control and one or more data connections.
    In this case, no (WRITE or READ) data may be sent over the control
    connection.
    
    The initiator and target negotiate during the first login as to which of
    the 2 possibilities they will use.
    
    In (1), it is the responsibility of the initiator to worry about not
    overloading the one and only connection so as not to delay delivery of
    critical task management messages.
    
    In (2), the iSCSI SCSI Command PDU specifies which data connection to use
    for the data of this command.
    
    On the data channels, where we will have iSCSI Data and R2T PDUs, we
    shouldn't need to use the long headers that we use to specify an iSCSI SCSI
    Command PDU. We will therefore have a shortened header for the data
    channels. In (1), since data will travel on the control channel, the iSCSI
    Data PDU and R2T headers will be padded with zeros so that all headers are
    of the same length on a particular connection.
    
    The use of R2T is negotiated during the first login of the iSCSI session.
    If R2T is to be used, then the initiator may not send data before it is
    requested by the target. Thus there will always be buffers ready to accept
    the data. If the target agrees to not use R2T, then the target implicitly
    agrees to have some number of buffers available to receive data sent by the
    initiator, even if the data arrives before the command arrives. In this
    case the initiator MUST send data in the data connections in the same order
    that the corresponding commands were sent. (This avoids deadlocks.) If the
    target runs out of buffers, then it will let data back up in the TCP window
    of the data connections, while it is processing the data from earlier
    commands.
    
    The only main drawback remaining with the asymmetric model is that 2
    separate operations may be required to set up sending a command and to
    register its DMA buffers. If the control and data connections happen to be
    on the same NIC, then this might not be a problem.
    
    Only one interrupt is required upon completing a READ data transfer, if we
    mark the last iSCSI Data PDU of the data transfer.
    
    - Kalman Meth.
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Sat Jul 06 23:18:46 2002
11148 messages in chronological order