RE: Fw: iSCSI - Errata - to 20

[Black_David@emc.com]

>  Julian> ...I am not going to comment on this anymore untill I hear from
>  Julian> David Black (I have no strong bias eitherway). ...
> 
> This sure seemed settled months ago.  I don't see a reason to reopen
> it yet another time.  It's important for things that are decided to
> STAY decided.  Did anyone give a strong reason why that decision was
> wrong and it's critical to reopen it?  I don't think so.  So let the
> previous decision stand.  Otherwise we can never reach completion.

I believe the long standing WG Rough Consensus on this issue is
"no change".  The version number is to stay at zero; that sort of
on-the-wire change is not appropriate during RFC publication unless
something is truly and clearly broken, and desire to indicate
that the implementer has read the published RFC in addition to the
final Internet-Draft approved by the IESG doesn't come close.

Thanks,
--David (with IPS WG co-chair hat on)
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------