Re: iSCSI: version number

[dave wysochanski <davidw@netapp.com>]

I agree.  With the recent UNH and Microsoft iSCSI plugfests,
and most industry players attending and demonstrating excellent
interoperability and compliance to the standard, it would be
a shame to change the version number at this point and
introduce technical non-compliance to many companies
for another few months.

Unless there's a strong reason not to do so, I say leave it at 0.


Sankar, Ranga wrote:

>  
>
> Could we leave the version number as 0? Is there a strong reason to 
> make this 1?
>
> -ranga
>
> "Robert D. Russell" <rdr@io.iol.unh.edu>
> 20/02/03 16:59
>  To Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL 
> cc ips@ece.cmu.edu 
> Subject iSCSI: version number
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
> Julian:
>
> Now that draft 20 has been accepted as an IETF standard,
> shouldn't the version number in section 10.12.4 be changed
> to 0x01?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob Russell
> InterOperability Lab
> University of New Hampshire
> rdr@iol.unh.edu
> 603-862-3774
>