RE: iSCSI: version number

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

PEOPLE have been asking for this change
all along and they where told that the IETF rules do not allow drafts to
carry any version number beyond 0.
That sounds to me like the version 1
is related to document status change. It will help also distinguish implementations
that support the RFC rather than the draft.

Julo

Black_David@emc.com
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

21/02/03 00:34

To	Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, rdr@io.iol.unh.edu
cc	ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject	RE: iSCSI: version number

Let me just check whether people want this done.  Are
implementations
going to be able to cope with a version number change from 0 to 1
some weeks or months from now?  Version number changes usually aren't
done to reflect changes in document status - rather they generally
reflect some sort of functional change.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508)
293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:25 AM
To: Robert D. Russell
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: iSCSI: version number



I will do it during the last 48h. Thanks, Julo 


"Robert D. Russell" <rdr@io.iol.unh.edu> 
20/02/03 16:59 ToJulian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL 
ccips@ece.cmu.edu 
SubjectiSCSI: version number







Julian:

Now that draft 20 has been accepted as an IETF standard,
shouldn't the version number in section 10.12.4 be changed
to 0x01?

Thanks

Bob Russell
InterOperability Lab
University of New Hampshire
rdr@iol.unh.edu
603-862-3774