Re: iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

there are no ordering issues in case
d. The termination is "brutal" - the whole session disappear.
In the other cases
some ordering side effects must be considered.

Julo

"Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu

06/01/03 15:16

Please respond to
<Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>

To	<ips@ece.cmu.edu>
cc
Subject	iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks

There are two sections titled Implicit Termination
of Tasks but they are slightly different. Which is correct?
 
Section 6.5 lists 4 items but section 10.14.5
only lists two.
 
If 6.5 is correct, why is item D not included
in the unit attention? SAM-3 says:
 
5.7.2 When a SCSI initiator port aborts
its own tasks
When a SCSI initiator port causes its own
task(s) to be aborted, no notification that the task(s) have been aborted
shall be returned to the SCSI initiator port
other than the completion response for the command or task
management function action that caused the
task(s) to be aborted and notification(s) associated with related
effects of the action (e.g., a reset unit
attention condition).
 
Eddy