Re: iSCSI: draft vs. 14 typos, suggestion, questions

["Julian Satran \(Actcom\)" <Julian_Satran@actcom.net.il>]

I will do the text change (I hope it makes it easier for at least one reader
is not worse for anybody else).
The reason why we choose the wording was that SAM associates the task set
with an initiator by the session is wording is equivalent.

Julo
----- Original Message -----
From: <pat_thaler@agilent.com>
To: <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>; <tomasb@s3group.cz>
Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; <ivan.pavelka@s3group.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: RE: iSCSI: draft vs. 14 typos, suggestion, questions


> See comment below. Pat
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 9:20 AM
> To: Tomá? Bartu?ek
> Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; ivan.pavelka@s3group.com
> Subject: Re: iSCSI: draft vs. 14 typos, suggestion, questions
>
>
>
> *** Section 6.11 : QUESTION
> Draft says:
>   When the session timeout (the connection state timeout for the last
>   failed connection) happens on the target, it takes the following
>   actions:
>
>     - Resets or closes the TCP connections (closes the session).
>     - Aborts all Tasks in the task set for the corresponding initi-
>       ator.
>
> What does the "corresponding initiator" mean? We think (:-)), that
> there is only one initiator for the session. The only possible
> explanation we see for that paragraph is, that the target should
> abort also other tasks of the same in __other__ sessions, but
> why?
> +++ your interpretation is correct - the statement means the initiator
that "owned" the session.
> Are you suggesting other wording?
> ++++
> <PAT> "Aborts all task sets associated with the session"
> (Task set was changed to plural because task set is defined as an I-T-L
nexus and there may be muliple ones in the session. <PAT>
>