SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: question and wording of Reject



    
    Dennis,
    
    I will take a look at all occurrences of "reject" and add PDU when
    required.
    As for the original question - a text request the is the "command" and no
    other response is due.
    The response due was meant for exchanges that involve other type of PDUs -
    e.g., a SCSI request that is followed by data - if you reject a data
    or SNACK you are still required to send the response.
    
    Julo
    
    
                                                                                                                                             
                          Dennis Young                                                                                                       
                          <dyoung@rhapsodyne        To:       ips@ece.cmu.edu                                                                
                          tworks.com>               cc:                                                                                      
                          Sent by:                  Subject:  iSCSI: question and wording of Reject                                          
                          owner-ips@ece.cmu.                                                                                                 
                          edu                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                             
                          06/22/2002 02:20                                                                                                   
                          AM                                                                                                                 
                          Please respond to                                                                                                  
                          Dennis Young                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                             
    
    
    
    Does a target need to send a Text Response after it has sent a Reject for
    the
    Text Request?  The 2nd sentense in sec 6.2 says a Text Response PDU must
    be returned, but the 3rd sentense seems to be conflicting.  Please clarify.
    
    
      on page 85 (draft 13):
          A target may reset an operational parameter negotiation by answering
    a
    
          Text request with a Reject.
    
      on page 105:
        6.2  Usage Of Reject PDU in Recovery
          Targets MUST NOT implicitly terminate an active task by sending a
          Reject PDU for any PDU exchanged during the life of the task.  If the
    
          target decides to terminate the task, a Response PDU (SCSI, Text,
          Task etc.) must be returned by the target to conclude the task.  If
          the task had never been active before the Reject (i.e., the Reject is
    
          on the command PDU), targets should not send any further responses
          because the command itself is being discarded.
    
    In general, the word "Reject" is pretty overloaded, it would be more clear
    to explicitly say "Reject PDU" for all situations that refer to the Reject
    PDU.
    Here are some of those situations:
    
        "Reject" in 2nd paragraph on page 85;
        "Reject" in 3rd paragraph on page 85;
        "Reject" in sec 6.9 page 110;
        "Reject" in 2nd paragraph on page 160;
        "Reject" in 1st paragraph on page 172;
    
    "Login Reject" on page 79: there is no reason code called "Login Reject",
    maybe the word Reject should be changed to lower case, to be consistent
    with the other occurances of "Login reject".
    
    Thanks,
    Dennis
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Sat Jun 22 07:18:40 2002
10940 messages in chronological order