Re: null termination of keys

[Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>]

Julian Satran wrote:
> 
> Luben,
> 
> You may be interested in pursuing a "Formal-iSCSI" and pass it through IETF as iSCSI-2.
> Many of us although appreciate the beauty of formalism want this standard out and used by people
> to build equipment.

There was no need for this, since I'm not trying to slow it down.

I was merely suggesting that _existing_ iSCSI concepts be put
down into a more formal manner.

Example of those are 4.1, 1.1 and the current work
by Robert about key dependencies.

That is, my suggestion was no changes at all, just rephrasing.
Then iSCSI will be cleaner and clearer to work with and to be
worked upon.

> In retrospect - the informal nature of almost all TCP/IP was not such a bad thing.

Not quite.

TCP/IP is formal _enough_ to disassociate ambiguities.
(E.g. RFC793/STD7 page 25, 26, 41, all full of inequalites,
equialities and definitions.)