Re: [iSCSI]: BiDiInitialR2T Question

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

That has crossed our minds too. The R2T is the same but many of us felt more comfortable enabling/disabling unsolicited data explicitly for
Bidirectional commands. As we know very little about the bidirectional command usage this seems a safe way to go.

Julo

Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com> Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu 05/23/2002 04:54 PM Please respond to Luben Tuikov

To:        iSCSI <ips@ece.cmu.edu>         cc:                 Subject:        [iSCSI]: BiDiInitialR2T Question

First, the text of this key (BiDiInitialR2T 11.11)
refers to BiDiR2T. In contrast InitialR2T (11.10)
refers to R2T, which I know what it is.

What is BiDiR2T?

Is it possible to do away with BiDiInitialR2T?

I see that both texts (11.10 InitialR2T and
11.11 BiDiInitialR2T) to be quite similar.

Furthermore, since incoming data (I <- T)
is always implicitly solicited (2.4.4, pg 41,
bottom), we don't need the ``bidirectional''
part. Just InitialR2T will do.

-- 
Luben