Re: MaxRecvPDULength question

["Julian Satran" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>]

That might be good as it is closer to what we mean anyhow and should not affect any existing implementation anyhow. 

Julo

Martins Krikis <mkrikis@yahoo.com> Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu 05/22/2002 10:19 PM Please respond to Martins Krikis

To:        ips@ece.cmu.edu         cc:                 Subject:        Re: MaxRecvPDULength question

--- Paul Koning <ni1d@arrl.net> wrote:

> Are you proposing to rename the key so its name is
> "MaxRecvDataLength"?  Yes, that would be more
> accurate, but why bother
> at this point?

Because it would be more accurate!

I personally don't mind changes in the draft that
make it clearer but require me to change one string
constant.

  Martins Krikis, Intel Corp.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com