RE: iSCSI: Last Call process

["KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>]

And if the AD/IESG had said that to me, I'd have asked "Do we have proof
that DH-CHAP would not have any IP issues"?  And "Do you really want the IPS
WG to work on a security-related draft?"

Even if we decided DH-CHAP looks good, it still would require a review
process that is longer than the timeframe for iSCSI last call...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Black_David@emc.com [mailto:Black_David@emc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:34 PM
> To: marjorie_krueger@hp.com
> Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu
> Subject: RE: iSCSI: Last Call process
> 
> 
> > This is not a question of "the WG wanting to get into a 
> process fight with
> > the IESG".  You haven't shared the reasoning behind the 
> IESG (or is it an
> > AD?) insistence that we examine the 
> proposed-but-non-existant DH-CHAP.
> 
> I thought I had - here it is again just in case:
> 
> The "acceptable authentication standard (SRP)" is potentially
> encumbered technology and the IESG wants to ensure that
> adequate consideration has been given to unencumbered alternatives ...
> 
> --David
>