SORT BY:

LIST ORDER
THREAD
AUTHOR
SUBJECT


SEARCH

IPS HOME


    [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

    Re: iSCSI: SRP status



    
    Thanks for the clarification. The draft was clear... that's
    why I was wondering, interpreting wrongly "another organization"
    as "an organization other then the deploying organization".
    
      Regards,
        Ofer
    
    
    Ofer Biran
    Storage and Systems Technology
    IBM Research Lab in Haifa
    biran@il.ibm.com  972-4-8296253
    
    
    David Jablon <dpj@theworld.com>@ece.cmu.edu on 27/03/2002 02:42:03
    
    Please respond to David Jablon <dpj@theworld.com>
    
    Sent by:    owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
    
    
    To:    Ofer Biran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
    cc:    Black_David@emc.com, ips@ece.cmu.edu
    Subject:    Re: iSCSI: SRP status
    
    
    
    Yes.
    
    The words "another organization" mean "an organization other
    than the owner of the SPEKE patent". The draft is intended
    to clearly explain that the methods are subject to a patent currently
    owned by Phoenix.  Please let me know if you find any of the
    language there to be unclear.
    
    -- David
    
    At 08:16 PM 3/26/02 +0200, Ofer Biran wrote:
    >Can you clarify the statement
    >
    >"...and that have been commercially deployed without licensing another
    >organization's patents."
    >
    >Aren't you talking here about the patented SPEKE methods ?
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    >    Ofer
    >
    >
    >Ofer Biran
    >Storage and Systems Technology
    >IBM Research Lab in Haifa
    >biran@il.ibm.com  972-4-8296253
    
    
    
    
    


Home

Last updated: Sat Mar 30 12:18:17 2002
9394 messages in chronological order