[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: iSCSI - started countdown to 11
The language in A.1 should be changed from the most recent change. Two things
on the changes -
1. We should have a MAY instead of (the now lower case) should to
indicate the agreement reached - or worst case delete the sentence.
2. The last sentence in the first para - newly added & repititive (last
sentence in previous paragraph) -
(in my opinion) tries to get around the agreement. It should either
be deleted, or changed to "some receiver implementation will provide
(significantly) better performance when the sender inserts markers" or
"some receiver implementations may provide degraded performance
to senders which do not insert markers". I prefer that we just not add it.
You have something like that in the previous paragraph anyway.
One comment on what was not changed -
1. The last sentence in the para before A.1 - "in certain environment, a
sender ...." - I would suggest be changed to "in certain implementation, ...".
As the behavior is more implementation dependent.
We reached a compromise on keeping it in the main draft and making
it a MAY. I hope we can keep that spirit.
Last updated: Fri Feb 22 19:18:05 2002
8863 messages in chronological order