Re: iSCSI: key negotiation - Unrecognized value?

[Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>]

Oh, sorry!

I guess I pay too much attention on semantics (meaning),
rather than just read what the draft says and try not to
interpret it.


Julian Satran wrote:
> 
> Marjorie is correct - the text is (quite) explicit about requiring reject.
> As for you example - the value to be answered by the target is the maximum acceptable - see the
> rules for numeric negotiations.
> 
> Julo
> 
>   Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>
>   Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu            To:        "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)"
>                                     <marjorie_krueger@hp.com>
>   20-02-02 22:21                            cc:        "Ips Reflector (E-mail)"
>                                     <ips@ece.cmu.edu>, Julian Satran/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
>                                             Subject:        Re: iSCSI: key negotiation -
>                                     Unrecognized value?
> 
> 
> 
> "KRUEGER,MARJORIE (HP-Roseville,ex1)" wrote:
> >
> > What is the proper response if you recognize a key, but are offered a value
> > that you don't recognize?  For instance, what if MaxConnections=yes is
> > offered?
> >
> > Where is that specified in the document?
> 
> v10, pg 34, top:
> 
> Any other key not understood by the responder may be ignored
> by the responder without affecting the basic function. However,
> the Text Response for a key not understood MUST be
> key=NotUnderstood.
> 
> v10, pg 33, middle:
> 
> If a responder does not support or is not allowed to use
> all of the offered options with a specific originator,
> it may use the constant "Reject".
> 
> Comments?
> 
> --
> Luben Tuikov, Senior Software Engineer, Splentec Ltd.
> Bus: +1-905-707-1954x112, 9-5 EST. Fax: +1-905-707-1974.

-- 
Luben Tuikov, Senior Software Engineer, Splentec Ltd.
Bus: +1-905-707-1954x112, 9-5 EST. Fax: +1-905-707-1974.